Tuesday, 17 July 2007

2007 SFJFF—Michael Hawley's Preview

Here in the Bay Area, March through July can feel like one long, extended film festival. The San Francisco International Asian American Film Festival leads into the San Francisco International Film Festival, which is followed by HoleHead, which comes before Frameline, which precedes the Silent Film Festival and I'm probably forgetting a half dozen or so mini-fests in between. By the time the San Francisco Jewish Film Festival ("SFJFF") rolls around, I'm grateful not only for its reliably excellent programming, but also for the three-month respite it signals before things start cooking again in mid-autumn with the Mill Valley, Arab, Latino and 3rd i festivals. The SFJFF—which is the oldest of its kind in the world—celebrates its 27th edition this year. I've had the chance to preview 14 of its selections—nine narrative features and five documentaries—all on screener DVDs except where noted.


My favorite of the bunch by far is Oliver Hirschbiegel's Just an Ordinary Jew. The festival catalogue description of the film—basically one man ranting in his apartment for 90 minutes—had me repeatedly pushing the DVD to the bottom of the pile. I was of course interested in seeing what the director of The Experiment and Downfall had been up to lately, but only to a point. Well, surprise, surprise … this film had me hooked from its first minute to its last. In an intensely engrossing performance, Ben Becker portrays a Hamburg journalist who is asked by a social studies teacher to speak about what it means to be a Jew in contemporary Germany. His caustic, deeply reflective reply, spoken into a portable cassette recorder while roaming the apartment, is what constitutes the entire film. The script is literate and wickedly sharp, and the film's visual style is interesting enough to sustain its singular setting. This is really one of the finest films I've seen this year. Here's one of my favorite lines chosen from dozens: "My father was convinced there was no God. My mother was more pessimistic."


The other German feature I previewed was Dani Levy's My Fuerher: The Truly Truest Truth About Adolf Hitler. Levy—whose 2005 film Go For Zucker received a respectable US theatrical release—is being honored at this year's festival with the Freedom of Expression Award. His latest is an outrageous comic fable and the first German film that's dared to poke fun at the Third Reich. The premise is that it's near the end of the war and Hitler has lost his mojo. He's expected to deliver a rousing New Year's Day speech, so a famous Jewish actor (played by The Lives of Others Stasi agent Ulrich Mühe) is released from a concentration camp and given the job of helping the Fueher rekindle his furor. For five days brimming with revenge opportunities, he becomes Hitler's drama coach, psychoanalyst and personal trainer. I had pretty low expectations for this film, as it was savaged by critics after its Berlin Film Festival premiere earlier this year. It did, however, make me laugh out loud several times, which is more than I can say about most comedies I see in a given year. The film is sure to cause controversy as to the appropriateness of such a comic treatment. Levy sees this approach as just another way to try and "understand what we will never understand." Incidentally, as part of its tribute to Levy, the SFJFF will also screen the director's 1998 thriller, The Giraffe.


Each year the festival screens a number of documentaries from Israel and I've seen three of this year's selections. The first, Ido Haar's 9 Star Hotel, is my favorite of all the festival docs I've previewed. It's a deeply moving, verité look at a group of young, illegal Palestinian construction workers who risk arrest each day to support their families. Living in makeshift camps in the hills overlooking the settlement of Modi'in, they scramble down rocky slopes each morning, and then dodge cars to cross a busy highway. All the while they must maintain constant vigilance to avoid detection by the Israeli police and military, even while they sleep at night. Those images and others are certain to resonate with US viewers as we deal with our own issues of immigration and illegal workers. The film is given further weight when you realize it was shot in the months leading up to the completion of the separation wall, which will effectively eliminate even this clandestine form of livelihood. The film, which had a brief theatrical release in New York this spring, has been criticized for its lack of context and analysis. True, it's a purely observational work, without narration. We only know what we hear and observe through Haar's handheld camera. Still, I appreciated the purity of this approach, and am certain that some other filmmaker will come along to fill in the picture, if one hasn't done so already.


Another fine Israeli documentary is Shimon Dotan's Hot House, which is a fairly objective look at the 10,000 Palestinians doing time in Israeli prisons for participating in acts of terrorism (or national liberation, depending on which side of the bars you're on). Dotan appears to have had unlimited access during the filming, which happened to take place in the months leading up to the 2006 Palestinian elections. Incarcerated candidates for both the Fatah and Hamas political parties are amongst those interviewed. I found the interviews shot in the women's prison of particular interest. Most of them are there on charges of "aiding and transporting a suicide bomber." One chilling interview in particular—of a former TV news anchor who took part in a restaurant bombing—has really stuck with me. When told that eight children were killed in the bombing, she smiles and calmly replies, "Both sides shoot children."


Lighter in subject matter and sure to be a crowd pleaser is Shlomo Hazan's Film Fanatic, which profiles the artistic and personal trials of one Yehuda Grovais, known as the Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) Steven Spielberg. In a culture where television and cinemas are forbidden, a special exception has been made for personal computers. And if those computers just happen to have a DVD drive, well then, Grovais is merely its content provider. His films are awful, at least the few clips we get to see; stiff, moralistic action films with absolutely no women and Grovais as hero. When his once robust business dwindles, he's forced to telemarket his product and seek out institutional film funding, neither of which proves successful. One potential producer tries to convince him to make Iranian-style art films. Meanwhile, heat from the Haredi community elders makes life even more difficult. Salvation finally comes, as it does for a number of budding filmmakers world wide, in the form of a short that wins a 10,000 sheckel festival prize. Oddly, the festival is only screening this film in Berkeley and San Rafael, so if you live in the city you'll need to travel to see this one.


Anyone with a predilection for Middle Eastern music should enjoy Florence Strauss's documentary Between Two Notes, which is a French-Canadian co-production. The titular two notes refers to the half tones common to occidental music and the quarter tones of oriental music, and how they have come to draw inspiration from each other over the centuries. The film travels all over the Middle East examining this phenomenon, from Coptic churches in Egypt where liturgical chants claim pharaonic origins, to Jaffa in Israel where Jewish musicians speak of their love for Arab composers such as Abdel Wahab. In one memorable scene we meet a man who has created an Arab trumpet by putting a small valve near the mouthpiece, thereby allowing quarter tones to ring out. Apart from being a bit unfocussed, my only complaint about the film is the director's intrusive voiceovers in which she talks about herself and her family history. Strauss's grandfather, legendary film producer Robert Hakim (Belle de Jour, L'Aventura, Pépé le Moko) was an Egyptian Jew who emigrated to France. This is interesting in and of itself, but its relationship to the film's main subject matter seems tenuous at best. Regardless, the film's exotic locales and thrilling musical sequences make this a choice viewing experience for music lovers.


At the 2006 Israeli Film Academy Awards, two narrative features shared the Best Picture prize and the SFJFF has included them both in this year's festival. While I don't think either are as dynamic or inspired as some other recent Israeli features, both are respectable efforts that will definitely be of interest to attendees of this festival. The first is Dror Shaul's Opening Night film Sweet Mud, which I saw at a festival press screening. Set on a kibbutz in 1974, it's a bittersweet story about a 12-year-old boy and his pretty, but mentally unstable widowed mother. The film is ultimately a critique of child-rearing within the Israeli kibbutz system and was inspired by the director's childhood memories. It's also the only film I've ever seen in which a major character receives a blowjob from a cow—in the opening scene no less!


Shemi Zarhin's Aviva My Love, which I saw at the Palm Springs International Film Festival, is about one woman's struggle to balance family demands with a need for artistic expression. Our harried heroine Aviva is an aspiring short story writer in those rare moments when she's not holding down a cooking job or dealing with her ultra needy family. When she begins seeking professional advice from a famous author with writer's block, a familial monetary crisis forces her into making a devil's bargain. The performances in this film are uniformly excellent, especially that of Assi Levy as Aviva, and I was taken with the film's unique setting in the Sea of Galilee town of Tiberias. Interestingly, all of the film's male characters are deeply flawed, and I wondered if the (male) director was intending to make some sort of statement about contemporary Israeli men. I should also mention that—in addition to sharing the Israeli Film Academy Award for Best Picture—this film also walked away with awards for Best Actress, Best Supporting Actress, Best Director, Best Editing and Best Screenplay.


As a Francophile who hopes that one day the Bay Area will have its own Rendez-vous with French Cinema or City of Lights City of Angels series, I'm grateful when other festivals step in with French fare that hasn't received US theatrical distribution or appeared at the San Francisco International. The SFJFF gives us two new French features this year, Roschdy Zem's Bad Faith and Lisa Azuelos's Gorgeous! Bad Faith is described as a romantic comedy, which it certainly is for the first two-thirds of its running time. Jewish Clara and Muslim Ishmael are a young, Parisian couple who've been together for four years. Neither they or their families are particularly observant when it comes to religion, but all that changes when Clara announces she's pregnant. What follows is a nicely observed look at the foibles of culture clash, until people begin doing things that seem way out of character. The story then takes a very dark turn, culminating in a tragedy of errors that leads our couple to an abortion clinic. The ending is weirdly ambiguous as to whether Clara did or didn't, and is followed by a mystifyingly cheery coda. Actor Zem (Days of Glory), co-starring as Ishmael, makes a promising, if flawed directorial debut here, and it's nice to see ingenue Cecile de France tackling a grittier role than ususal.


Lisa Azuelos's Gorgeous! is the type of film I would normally file under Could Not Care Less; four smart 'n snappy urban women deal with relationship and family issues when they're not yacking on cell phones or reading celebrity gossip magazines, or hanging out in the fabulous beauty spa one of them owns or dishing the hot men who are pursuing them. It's been compared to Sex and the City, but with husbands and kids, and I found myself mostly enjoying it in spite of myself. The fast-moving script is generous with clever one-liners, and I was even able to (barely) forgive the clichéd pop-song montages (except for the dreaded We Are Family, which mercifully comes at the film's end). I especially got a kick out of a subplot in which divorced salon-owner Isa enters into a civil union with her indispensable Arab maid/nanny in order to keep her from being deported. This renders her Jewish mama apoplectic ("40 years in France for my daughter to marry her maid!"). Oh right, I neglected to mention that all four women are Jewish, a fact that seems pretty much incidental to the story, except for the holiday celebrations that bookend the film.


In the festival this year are two films which take a look at the Jewish Diaspora in Latin America. The first is Gabriela Böhm's documentary The Longing: The Forgotten Jews of South America, which begins by taking a historical look at the emigration of crypto-Jews to the New World during the Inquisition. We next meet up with a small group of their descendants from various parts of South America, all of whom have some vague sense of their family's Jewish past, i.e. a great-grandmother who lit candles every Friday and refused to eat pork. United by their desire to officially convert to Judaism, they've enlisted the help (via the internet) of Rabbi Jacques Cuikerkorn from Kansas City. The rabbi specializes in the conversion of crypto-Jews and the bulk of the film centers on a journey he makes to Guayaquil, Ecuador to convert the aspiring faithful. This part of the film is quite moving and I was particularly fascinated by the resistance of the established Jewish community in Guayaquil (most of whom emigrated from Europe during WWII) to accept these new converts whom they feel "muddy the waters of traditional Judaism."


Alejandro Springall's My Mexican Shiva is a broad, middling comedy I desperately wanted to like. It's hardly awful, but neither is it particularly inspired. When family patriarch Moishe dies of a heart attack, his extended family and friends gather together for seven days to mourn, pay respects and kvetch. Secrets are revealed and desires re-ignited and so on. If the idea of an eccentric, pot-smoking new-age aunt is your idea of hilarity, then this film may be for you. As for me, it only came alive in a scene where Moishe's reviled shiksa mistress dares to show her face at the shiva, and something truly unexpected happens.


A sidebar to this year's festival is a focus on Jewish boxers, and boxing historian Mike Silver provides some interesting statistics in his SFJFF catalogue essay. For example, from 1914 to 1939 there was a Jewish world champion in every single year. But as Program Director Nancy K. Fishman also notes, when it comes to boxing, "you're either enamored or repulsed by it." Count me in the latter camp, which is why of all the boxing films in the festival I chose to view legendary Jewish B-movie director Edgar Ulmer's 1943 comedy My Son, the Hero. The film features a supporting performance by Jewish boxer "Slapsie" Maxie Rosenbloom as Kid Slug, whose third-rate manager Percy (Roscoe Karns) is expecting a visit from his war hero son. With the help of The Kid's wise-cracking girlfriend Gerty (a revelatory performance by Patsy Kelly), they help Percy put on the dog for the son who believes his father is some rich big-shot. This film was a delight to watch, not least because it's loaded with the delicious slang of its day. I wanted to hijack a time machine just so I could go toss around phrases like hash-slinger, slug-nutty, scram, and here's mud in your eye.


The festival comes to a close with Rachel Talbot's documentary Making Trouble: Three Generations of Funny Jewish Women, which profiles the lives and careers of six 20th century comediennes: Molly Picon, Fanny Brice, Sophie Tucker, Joan Rivers, Gilda Radner and Wendy Wasserstein. I'm pretty familiar with all of their stories and happily, this film added a good deal of new information to what I already knew. It contains some choice photos and clips (an 80-year-old Picon turning tumblesaults on the Mike Douglas Show for example), although as is usually the case with these types of documentaries, I wouldn't have complained if there had been even more. I thought the section on Sophie Tucker was particularly well done, and it was nice to be reminded of a time when I didn't loathe Joan Rivers. The documentary is framed by four contemporary Jewish comics who banter while noshing at Katz's Deli in NYC. Embarrassingly, I admit to my unfamiliarity with all four, but their comments and observations about our six subjects, and Jewish humor in general, are pointed and colorful.

Friday, 13 July 2007

MIDNIGHT MASS 10TH ANNIVERSARY WEEKEND—The Evening Class Interview With Joshua Grannell (aka Peaches Christ), Pt. 2


Part One of this interview can be found here.

Guillén: I'm not sure if it's your makeup that accents your reactions to make them so funny; but—when I was watching the YouTube clip of your interview with Mink Stole—when she mentioned how she would like to steal your designer, there's this moment of genuine panic on your face that is priceless!! [Laughter.]

Grannell: That's been a running joke now. Not only is Tria a brilliant costume designer who has graciously devoted herself to this character and is responsible for so much of the branding and the look and the aesthetic of Peaches; but, she's also Peaches' personal assistant. She's traveled with me when we go on the road. She's the one who makes sure I have my straw. She knows I can't drink out of a Coke can. She has just been amazing and I couldn't do it without her. Elvira and Tura and Mink have all said to me, "We're going to steal Tria. I'm stealing Tria." Because, y'know, if you're in show business, I got a costume designer and an amazing personal assistant and practical body guard all wrapped up in one person.

Guillén: This 10th season seems the perfect retrospective. You're bringing John Waters for the first time but you're returning with Mink Stole, you're returning with Tura, and you're returning with Elvira. It's a stunning celebrity line-up this year.


Grannell: It is. When I brought Elvira for the ninth year as Cassandra, I made that decision because to bring Elvira is much more expensive and there's a lot more involved obviously and rightfully so. But also, I wanted to do the behind-the-scenes interview with her. If you were at the Tura show, not only do you get to see the woman that played Varla but her [real life] story is so amazing. To hear the story behind Varla, that's the movie, the story of her life. With Cassandra being the 9th year guest, I was worried that I was shooting myself in the foot because—as a horror hostess, as a midnight movie queen, as a cult film person—you bring Elvira; who's left really? I always knew there was only one person who could fill those shoes for the 10-year anniversary and it was John and I was so worried because you don't know. He could have been busy. He could turn you down. He could be not interested. So it's always a little scary. Once I knew we had John, then I actually talked to Cassandra and she agreed to come back as Elvira. Then I decided to bring Mink for the Friday night show and then Tura called me and said, "I want to be there." It's just so weird. My life is so weird right now because, y'know, I would never have dreamed [a line-up like this].

Guillén: That's how I'm feeling lately. Everybody I've wanted to meet, I'm meeting. Or befriending. How the hell did that happen? One year ago this wasn't happening. What happened between then and now? I think it was seeing your Tura Satana show! I think I got a major Peaches fix!

Grannell: Oh really? Good!

Guillén: Let's talk about your film Grindhouse. The title got stolen from you by that dang Quentin. Have you come up with a new title?


Grannell: Yes. As soon as I heard in the trades that he was [making Grindhouse] and—just from reading what he was doing—I knew 1) that the title was perfect for his project and 2) that his project was in no way similar to mine. I had to make a decision right away, like, "I'm not going to be upset about this. I just have to accept it and move on." Now other people on my behalf were really upset. But I had been working on the feature script for a while when I heard about his title and just decided there would be enough room for all of us to make a movie. But I'm not stupid. I'm not going to keep the title. I'm changing the title. There is not a firm title yet. I did have to register it with the Writers Guild of America because I do have a finished screenplay and I do have a producer attached. Right now it's called Ladies and Gentlemen, Welcome to Violence, which is the first line of Faster Pussycat! Kill! Kill! and I thought it summed up what my movie is about. It's very showbiz, tongue in cheek, it's about a woman who makes snuff films and passes them off as art films, so it's violent but it's also really silly and over the top.

Guillén: Have you started filming?


Grannell: No. It will be a long process. There's a lot of irony with the other Grindhouse. One is that the guy who's attached to produce my feature, Darren Stein, he wrote and directed a film called Jawbreaker, which was out a few years ago. Carol Kane is in it. Pam Grier is in it. Marilyn Manson's in it. All these great people are in it. And Rose McGowan stars in this movie Jawbreaker. When Darren read my script, he had seen my short film and had been a fan of Peaches, he said to me, "I really want to produce your movie. I want to get into producing. I have the connections you need and let's take your screenplay and show it to Rose McGowan. She's trying real hard to get off this … or not off this TV show but she needs something dark. She needs something edgy. She really needs to be the vixen that she can be." A few months later he called and he said, "I've got news." I said, "I already know. Quentin Tarantino's making a movie called Grindhouse." He was like, "But do you know who's starring in it?" [Laughs.] I said, "Who?" He said, "Rose. Rose just told me she's playing the lead and she's appearing in both movies."

Guillén: That damn Quentin. He must be reading your mail.

Grannell: If I swallow these things and I accept them, I've found that things end up working out for the best. She could still be in my movie and it wouldn't [be an issue]. It's not the same. No one would really put the two together except if you know my story and know that I made a short called [Grindhouse].

Guillén: So when do you think you might start shooting?

Grannell: The thing that happened was I was on this great momentum to get a great screenplay. You're always writing and rewriting and I haven't been ready to say, "This is the finished screenplay." I'm 80% there. Even though I have a finished screenplay, I still want to work on it.

Guillén: It still needs to be doctored a bit?


Grannell: I think so. But when the Mark Cuban HD TV show started to get tossed around, it was like, "Oh, we want you to write a treatment." The more that became a reality, there was more work involved with getting and designing a TV show than I would have imagined as well as a 10th anniversary season. So really my first feature is on a shelf. It hasn't been touched. I'm going to revisit it in September or October when I'm done with this 10th season and the TV show.

Guillén: Let's talk about the TV show, it's HDTV?

Grannell: It's called HDNet. It's a channel that Mark Cuban owns. I don't know enough about it. I should probably be briefed. It's high definition television. It's national [though] you can't get it here; Comcast doesn't carry it locally, which really blows. It's like I'm going to have this TV show and I'm not even going to be able to see it locally. You can get it via satellite here, but most markets you can get it through your regular cable service. My parents have it. Other people have it. It's for people who have high definition televisions so their market skews a little older, wealthier [customer base] … actually, not really though. They were telling me that a lot of kids are tech savvy now. Kids in college have HD TVs. The real story about it is that IFC had shot a pilot with a production company….

[At this juncture of the interview, our conversation was interrupted by a large splat as bird shit hit the table less than an inch from Joshua's Pellegrino. His eyebrow arched infamously. I shouted up at the bird, "You missed the bottle!"]


Grannell: [After regaining his composure and his train of thought.] This guy Jack Lechner, a really sweet producer, has a production company out of New York and he was producing this pilot for a TV show called "Cult Movies" for the Independent Film Channel. IFC's first movie that they were going to run for this Cult Movie Friday was going to be Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! [1965] so they came to the Tura Satana show—that's why there were camera crews there—and they produced this really great pilot and Midnight Mass ended up being the focus of this whole show. They didn't know when they came in but once they saw the benefit of having the fans, the audience Q&A, and a lot of stuff with Tura and I and then my interview, that ended up being basically this whole 30-minute show that was supposed to lead in to this televised screening of Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! Somehow, IFC lost the rights to screening Faster, Pussycat! Kill! Kill! to Turner Classic. Turner Classic then decided to do a cult movie Fridays and Jack Lechner took them the TV show, "Cult Movies" that he had shot, the pilot that we were all on, and tried to sell it to Turner. Turner said they were interested and we didn't hear back from them. Then Tura called me and Tura said, "Have you been contacted by Rob Zombie's people yet?" and I said, "No!" and she said, "Oh, Rob Zombie's been hired to make a TV show for Turner Classic Movies called 'Cult Movies.' " So what Turner did was they loved the TV show, but for whatever reason, we can only sort of guess. We don't know what their real reasons were; but, I'm guessing that I'm not famous, I'm not nationally recognized and I may be edgy in a way that they're not comfortable with and I'm a drag queen and my last name is Christ, all of those things might have played into them going to Rob Zombie.

Guillén: You think? [Laughter.]

Grannell: Especially when they're called Turner Classic Movies; but, who knows? One of the things that I've tossed around is doing a modern cult classic and doing a show tribute to Rob Zombie. I told Cassandra this because she's friends with him and I said, "If you can ever put in a good word for me with Rob Zombie, please do, because I love The Devil's Rejects [2005], I thought it was just so wonderful, and I would love to do a show where maybe we do a tribute to Rob around Halloween or something; but, that's like one of those dreams come true. He's one of my favorite people right now. He's sort of the male heavy metal version of Peaches in many ways. He's doing on a much larger scale what I would love to do.

Guillén: Why don't you invite him?

Grannell: Well, I mean, we might! Someday I'd love to get in touch with him. That would be amazing. I have a wish list now. I would love to invite all sorts of people.

Guillén: Which leads me to ask how you could top your celebrity line-up for this year?!


Grannell: That's the thing. For 10 years of Midnight Mass, I think we have the perfect season. A lot of the feedback we got from last year where we had Mink Stole for Polyester [1981], we had Robyn Lively for Teen Witch [1989], we had the cast for Beyond the Valley of the Dolls [1970], we had Cassandra Peterson, we had Mary Woronov for Death Race 2000 [1975], and the feedback I was getting was, "We love the celebrities but we miss you guys. We miss the shows with just you." We loved Tranny Dearest, the silly pre-show with just me and Heklina and Martiny doing a theatrical version of one of our movies spoofing Mommie Dearest. So this season we were really clear: we said, y'know, we're going to bookend the series with these big special guest weekends and the rest is going to be more vintage Midnight Mass.

Guillén: I'm glad to hear that because I know when I came to the Tura Satana show, I was reminded of the joy in imagination that used to be rampant in the Bay Area underground theater scene. As someone who moved here during the mid-70s, I used to take music lessons with one of The Cockettes….

Grannell: Scrumbly?

Guillén: Yeah, Scrumbly Koldewyn. He was my music coach and sometimes my seamstress. I remember the Angels of Light and I remember the spirit of creativity that was strong at that time, inspiring the populace, which proved that with cardboard and a little glitter and lots of ego and the imaginative participation on behalf of the audience, a performer could really do something! Could create fantastic magic. And then it seemed that sense of outrageous play vanished for many years and didn't really come back until the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence, though they were undercut by more of a social conscience. In some ways that's why the drag scene didn't really appeal to me because it seemed somehow derivative. You, however, are truly creative and in control of your form.

Grannell: Thank you.

Guillén: As I mentioned before, your humor is perfectly pitched. It can be biting but it's not vicious like I note in a lot of drag queens.

Grannell: That's one of the things that I think is misunderstood about Peaches. She's not mean. Not at all. She's never mean. She's really just a dorky fan of these people and wants to put them up on a pedestal; but, then she can be a little wicked here and there, a little bit snarky once in a while; but, she's not mean.

[At this juncture in the interview Joshua's boyfriend Andrew stopped by our table to say hello on his way to work. Joshua introduced us and complimented his attire. Andrew went on his way.]

Guillén: I didn't think you had a boyfriend!

Grannell: I know, everyone says that.

Guillén: You've stated in print that you think love is ridiculous and sex abhorrent. I'm shocked!

Grannell: Heklina recently went after Peaches on stage about Andrew and I just act like I don't know what she's talking about. I think I even remember which interview you're talking about, but, yeah, it's true. I have a boyfriend.

Guillén: Well there was one interview where you said love was silly and another where you said anyone who would want to have sex with you should seek therapy.


Grannell: And all of those things I still stand by. [Laughter.] I really do. I went to that Queen Party and there was this straight guy who was really hitting on Peaches saying, "Have you ever gone home with a straight guy before?" and I just looked at him and said, "Look, I'm afraid to go home with any guy who's attracted to me because you're probably like Charles Manson or something. Look at me! I'm a clown!" And I don't totally necessarily agree with that—I can sort of see why people are attracted to Peaches—but, I just don't think of it as a sexual thing at all. When I'm in drag, everything is ludicrous and absurd so any sort of sexuality I exude is satire, it's over the top and spoofing sex, y'know? If I am in drag or if I refer to Andrew while I'm Peaches, I usually say my "male traveling companion" or I kind of turn old lady about it, "my gentleman friend" but I never acknowledge that he's my domestic partner, that I have a long-time boyfriend or anything like that. I lie about it.

Guillén: Not to be too maudlin, but, I just lost my partner. He accepted a job in Reno and moved there. But I was reading that you take your act to Reno now and then. What's that about?

Grannell: I produce a bus trip that we do with Trannyshack. Every year there's Trannyshack Reno where Trannyshack goes to Reno to do a show. It's fun. But the real trip is that Heklina goes up a few days before I do. She puts the show together. But I actually bring a bus of about 70 drag queens in full drag, charter a bus and take them up to Reno for an overnight.

Guillén: Please let me know when you do that. I would love to show my boyfriend your show. Or hitch a ride on the bus!

Grannell: Get on my newsletter and you'll get all sorts of obnoxious reminders.

Guillén: Well, Peaches, Joshua, I'll let you go. I think I have enough here to work with. What a pleasure. I respect so much the culture that you create for the city of San Francisco, that you remind us to have fun, and to edge forward.

Grannell: Thank you. I'm glad to be included amongst your esteemed collection of interviews.

Guillén: I'm sorry that it's taken me so long to get to you.

Grannell: It's perfect timing.

MIDNIGHT MASS 10TH ANNIVERSARY WEEKEND—The Evening Class Interview With Joshua Grannell (aka Peaches Christ), Pt. 1


Are you superstitious? No? Pity. Because—if you were superstitious—you would know that showing up at The Bridge Theater at midnight tonight on Friday the 13th will be nothing but fun luck. On the other hand, if you haven't already purchased your tickets, you're probably out of luck, you Silly Rabbit. Peaches Christ is launching her 10th annual Midnight Mass, with Mink Stole and Tura Satana tonight and an onstage appearance by John Waters tomorrow night. On the eve of such a celebratory occasion, I thought it would be a good time to interview Joshua Grannell (the alter ego of Peaches Christ), though I had expressed concerns that it would be like being an audience member at a televised tennis match.

I did not get a crick in my neck, however. Joshua was level-headed and polite, stared me straight in the eye and did not even shift his head from side to side. Every now and then, though, his infamous eyebrow would lift to the rafters. He informed me that Peaches Christ is an underground drag phenomenon, emcee, filmmaker, and actor. Ms. Christ currently resides in San Francisco where her Backlash Production Company and Midnight Mass movie series are based. Her Midnight Mass road-show and Short Film Retrospective have been on tour and appeared in Seattle, Berkeley, New York City, Brussels, Belgium, and Lausanne, Switzerland. Midnight Mass is San Francisco's hugely popular midnight movie event. It began in the chilly summer of 1998. The elaborate pre-show stage productions, guest stars, and drag spectacles continue to draw sell-out crowds.

Peaches also stars in a number of short films written and directed by Grannell. Three of these, which make up the "Tran-ilogy of Terror," reverently tip their hats to horror classics and include the titles "Season of the Troll," "A Nightmare On Castro Street," and "Whatever Happened to Peaches Christ?" All have become international hits at film festivals and on cable television. Grannell's fourth short film, "Grindhouse," is a gore comedy currently being developed into a feature-length film to be shot in the Bay Area.

Joshua and I met for Pellegrino waters at Café Duboce on a slightly windy day. I knew the meeting was going to be fortuitous because on the way to the café I found a glittery lavender pencil; an omen if ever I've seen one. I wore a red Girbaud denim jacket to be identified and Joshua did his best to avoid appearing ordinary and mundane.

* * *

Michael Guillén: In reading Eve's SFist interview with you, I was amused by her admitting she was intimidated to meet you. I was a bit the same at first … until this week. I don't know what happened. Something snapped. I figured if I could talk to Mink Stole and her alter ego Nancy Stoll and RuPaul and her alter ego R. Charles, I could talk to any split personality!


Joshua Grannell: That's so funny. I get that a lot. Not so much in interviews but people who come up at a show or whatever. I've been asking people, "Why is that?" What really spelled it out for me was I did a Vegas in Space reunion last Fall in honor of their 15-year anniversary and one of the queens in the movie came up to me and she was like, "I've always wanted to talk to you but I've always been super afraid to talk to you" and I was like, "Why?!" and she was like, "Because your pictures and your name and everything is so scary!" Like with the licking of the knife.

Guillén: That is a little offputting.

Grannell: Right.

Guillén: But then it was actually Mink Stole who said, "Oh, but you know what? He's the sweetest man in the world."

Grannell: Oh good. Okay.

Guillén: I was willing to approach you on the level of your humor alone; I think you are so funny. Have you had theater training? You have your comic timing down pat.


Grannell: Thank you. I grew up in Maryland and there was nothing to do so I was the kid in the drama club, just sort of doing theater stuff, like I was that kid who put on plays in the neighborhood and did haunted houses. We actually borrowed land in the neighborhood. I had to write and get permission and created this haunted trail through the woods. I was always directing the other kids in how to perform and I wrote scripts. My parents were so supportive but when I look back on that it's so weird that I was such a weirdo horror theater queen at such a young age.

Then in high school there was this great opportunity to become part of this thing called Peer Scene Theater where these professionally trained improvisational theater people were going to train a bunch of kids on improv theater. We had nothing like that in Anapolis, Maryland. Even in Baltimore and D.C. arts for kids and high school students, well, there wasn't a whole lot. I was lucky enough to audition and get cast in this little festival troupe and so in high school I had a lot of rigorous improv theater training. That's what really carried through and is a big part of Peaches.

Guillén: That's such a young age to get started. You basically began Peaches in your 20's, right?

Grannell: Yes, it was my senior year in college. I was 21 when I first did it.

Guillén: That's amazing when you think about it; that you had the courage to create and develop this drag persona at 21! Let's talk about your design campaign for the 10-year anniversary. It's fabulous.

Grannell: Thank you.

Guillén: Who did the design?


Grannell: That's one of those things that—whenever someone tells me how much they like it—I have to stop and say, "This is the story. The 10-year anniversary is the best example of how [Peaches Christ and Midnight Mass is] a collaborative effort; it is not a one-queen show. It never has been. What we did this year was a little different than in previous years, dependent upon timing and stuff because we knew it was the 10-year anniversary. I was actually able to sit down with my costume designer Tria, who's been my costume designer for 10 years; Chris Hatfield, who's been my designer for 10 years; and my stage manager and a big group of people and say, "Okay, what are we going to do? What is the campaign going to be? We met with Leo Herrera, the photographer, who is new to the city but we knew we wanted to work with him. He's a brilliant young photographer who has taken the city by storm. He's in his 20's. He and his brother are churning out such amazing work. They actually have a big new section on their website called "Peaches Christ As Muse", which I just clicked through. It shows how they moved here and became inspired by Peaches and started doing all this stuff. It's going to be really cool. I think it's going to go public next week. I'll send out a newsletter about it.

So we sat down and talked with everyone and all I said was, "It has to be cult and it has to be celebratory of 10 years. It has to be a cut above." They came up with the 50-foot Peaches idea and nailed it!

Guillén: And not only that, the burning city! It's not only that Peaches is 50-feet tall; the city's on fire!

Grannell: It's like she's taken the city by storm this year. I always feel like—when it's not my idea—that they thought of it, Tria came up with the costume—the shredded dress and the gold—she's the one who said Peaches needs to be gold and blonde; the look should be golden. Chris, my graphic designer, when he started he was a comic book artist who worked at the Bridge and in 10 years he's [become] a major graphic designer for Landmark Theaters. The Peaches website got him noticed by Barbra Streisand's people. They hired him this past winter to revamp her merchandise section. So it's just funny in 10 years … when we started … I still have the original flyers where he had cut-and-pasted everything himself. They weren't even done on the computer. All of his first flyers from the first year were like old punk rock comic book style.

Guillén: You're holding on to those, I hope.


Grannell: I have the boards. Something that the media doesn't really know yet but we're sending out a press release in the next week or so is that Friday, September 7, the deYoung Museum is throwing a big party called "A Decade of Peaches Christ" and a lot of that stuff will be on display. It's their attempt to have high society meet the artistic underground. They've been doing it more and more and with the Vivienne Westwood exhibit they really saw that—wow—we should be celebrating these movements that are right here in our own back yards. So they called me and, of course, I'm flattered and think it's hilarious and wonderful and exciting.

Guillén: It is! And I respect that you recognize the spirit of collaboration because I absolutely understand that. Everything creative that has ever happened to me in my life has been a collaborative process. My alter ego is Maya who's this gonzo celebrity journalist. I loved how you referred to my Evening Class sidebar of interviews as "a collection." Because that's how I feel. It's like, "Who do I want to talk to today?"

Grannell: Right!

Guillén: And the persona of Maya—any persona really—allows you so much freedom. Are you much different than Peaches?

Grannell: Yes!

Guillén: You're more shy, I take it?

Grannell: Yes. I mean, I'm more … well, I'm a bit of an introvert actually. There are so many great variations on drag as a costume. I would say that someone like Heklina—who's a great girlfriend of mine—is very similar whether she is in drag or out of drag. The humor is the same. She's just the same in or out of drag. For me it's a little different. When I'm doing Peaches, I think of it more as a character. Peaches lies all the time. I'm never really very honest when I'm Peaches. When someone asks me a personal question, I keep the two a little bit separate.

Guillén: Surprisingly—or perhaps not so surprisingly—when I was dealing with RuPaul, I didn't much care for her. She was a little too much of a diva for my tastes. And it wasn't until I ran into R. Charles at the Frameline closing night party that I actually felt any connection and considered that maybe we could conduct an interview afterall. The persona can be a purposeful interference.

Grannell: Interesting. People ask me to do a certain kind of interview and I have the same kind of issue as Cassandra Peterson; I know exactly what she's talking about. She said to me—and this is how I feel—if you interview Cassandra, you can get all the real take on it and the behind-the-scenes dirt and the real story—but if you interview Elvira, you're going to get a lot of one-line jokes about boobs and Valley Girl talk. I kind of think—maybe not to an extreme degree—but I relate more to that as Peaches and Joshua than I do, y'know, sort of like it being the same thing whether I'm in or out of drag. It is different.

Guillén: I know you've been asked this probably a million times but: where did Peaches come from? Who inspired this campaign?

Grannell: Well, it's obviously evolved a lot in 10 years. As far as my first time doing drag, I did it for a movie, I did it for my senior thesis film at Penn State. That was really the first time I was in drag.

Guillén: Jizzmopper?

Grannell: Exactly, Jizzmopper. The story goes that I did it to save the movie because the drag queen we hired was late and costing us money. We were shooting on 16mm film. It was a senior thesis film. There were deadlines, real concerns, and the administration—I don't think they ever really liked the movie. Most of the kids at my film school at Penn State were white heterosexual males. I was the only gay film student, which is insane when you think about that. We were the motley crew. The black girl worked on my sound design. The Christian freak that no one could understand was my cinematographer and we became close friends. The administration always dissolved one project and it looked like it was going to be ours because of this drag queen actor that wouldn't show up. So I stepped in and started playing the role to keep the movie going. I literally on set one day took those costumes, put them on me, changed the name from Coco to Peaches—the actor was Puerto Rican—and stepped in and played the part. My boyfriend always laughs, he says, "You tell that story and the truth is you were probably jonesing to do it." It's probably true. I don't think they had to twist my arm so much to do it.

Guillén: You had the name Peaches Christ in mind?


Grannell: No. The name was Peaches Nevada because Martiny—who's my sidekick who I met when I was 18, who makes me look fabulous and never gets as much credit for being a lot of the brains behind what we do; I'm sort of more the visionary and Martiny fills in a lot of the brilliant gaps—she actually said, "What about Peaches Christ?" because at the time it was really trendy for drag queens to—drag hadn't quite exploded, it kind of exploded right after that, it was exploding—but it was real popular for people to twist celebrity names, like here we have Syphilis Diller, Mildred Fierce, or whatever, [names] that were based on some other character, and I loved the idea of Peaches Christ; but, really, Martiny suggested it. The Christian cinematographer said, "Please, don't do that. My parents are paying for a quarter of this movie and they will freak out. They can handle the jizz but they can't handle the Christ. That would be more offensive." So we actually changed the name to Nevada. But that name [of Peaches Christ] was always there and so—as soon as Martiny and I got on the plane and started heading to San Francisco—we knew that I was dropping the whole Nevada thing.

Guillén: This was in Philadephia?

Grannell: No, Penn State is smack dab in the middle of the state.

Guillén: And you brought John Waters there, I understand?

Grannell: Yeah. That was part of our—in some ways—rebellion [against] the conservatism that was Penn State. Finally I was a member of the student film organization, Martiny was a leader of the queer organization, and so we put a grant together between the two of us to co-sponsor his visit. Because you had to raise the money and get his [honorarium] and the airfare and all that and we did. It was 1) a way to show that you could become a successful filmmaker making the kind of movies we wanted to make and 2) really just an excuse for us to hang out with our idol. We picked him up from the airport. We took him to eat breakfast, lunch and dinner. We really got to spend a lot of great [time] because, y'know, we were the kids hosting his visit. And he loved doing that stuff. I think he probably still does it. He really liked going to the colleges and doing the university circuit. It's kind of like I feel with our deYoung Museum thing; it's like weird and hilarious but I'm certainly going to enjoy it.

Guillén: Absolutely. I imagine this feels wonderful then to finally bring him to Midnight Mass?

Grannell: It's a dream come true. Literally, in every way, he would be the ultimate guest for us to have on our anniversary show because he encouraged Martiny and I to move to San Francisco. We knew then that I wanted to be a filmmaker; but, we knew—after having just shot Jizzmopper in New York, all the exterior shots—New York was just starting to change; but, I wasn't ready for New York and I didn't think I wanted to live in L.A. and so we were looking at San Francisco as sort of a bridge to one of these other cities. I knew that I did not want to move back to Maryland, which John totally understood. There's already John Waters in Maryland. He and his friends did something so extraordinary [that] we knew we had to go someplace and figure things out. He told us about the Cockettes. He told us about how much he loved San Francisco. He really put the seeds in our heads for Midnight Mass and the fact that he's our guest for the 10-year anniversary is just perfect.

Guillén: And also that you'll have Mink Stole.

Grannell: I couldn't be more in love with someone. I just love her so much. You're telling me that she's saying such sweet things about me and I get choked up because it's like she was the first person willing to come to be the first big guest of honor. We called it "Idol Worship: Come worship at the altar of Mink Stole" and at the time I didn't know that she hadn't really been honored that way. It wasn't until she came here and experienced the show—we had Mink effigies and Mink blown-up on the curtain and "Hail Mink!" on a banner and put her on a throne and did this big tribute show. It wasn't until the weekend was over that she said, "Everyone does this for John. And certainly they did it for Divine. Whereas if we ever got something like this, it would be Divine and Edie and myself; but, this is the first time it's really been just for me." That was such an amazing revelation for me because I think she so deserves to be put up on a pedestal.

Guillén: Absolutely! I was a little bit on her case about writing down her memoirs. She really has to get that down because she's starting to forget things and lose her memories. She couldn't really remember how she first became involved with Midnight Mass. She remembered the second and third times because she was already here in San Francisco doing the play; but, how did you actually contact her that first time?


Grannell: I think through … y'know, it's sad, I'm losing my memory! [Laughter.] A lot. I'm not a nostalgic person really. My friends tend to be. They're really the ones who remember everything. When we're doing one show, I'm always thinking one show ahead and always kind of thinking about the next one and so—doing a lot of interviews lately—I'm like, "Oh my God, I'm really clueless. I need to have notes or something." But I think the way it happened was her website. She had a really cool website at the time. Her website now … well … we need to redo it. I'm trying to put her in touch with the right people to really make something fabulous. But she had someone doing a really cool website and I emailed them and they put me in touch with this guy who was kind of acting as an agent of sorts. He was helping her with gigs and stuff. She was doing other movies. I think she had a project with John going on. She was busy but we negotiated. The thing about Midnight Mass—it was true then and it's still very true now—was that nobody, including the celebrities, nobody has ever gotten paid what they're worth or what they could charge. [With] everyone it's a labor of love. Now, of course everything is very confidential, but I can say that everyone who has come—whether it's the people who work here in San Francisco on the costumes or the sets or anything like that or the celebrities who have come—it's always been a gift. To me and to San Francisco really because no one's gotten paid what they're worth. She was the first to really come and take that sort of chance.

Guillén: It's an aesthetic really. Again—in the spirit of collaboration—they're being true cultural warriors keeping that aesthetic alive. For some reason, I've always been a little bit scared of drag. I don't know why. I've been around plenty of people in drag but—for a long time—I was afraid to go to Midnight Mass. [Laughter.]

Grannell: I understand why and I think in the early years it was a lot scarier than it is now.

Guillén: But one of my closest friends has been following you since the get-go and he said, "I'm taking you to see Tura Satana. Tura Satana's going to be in town and you have got to see her!" and I'm like, "Tura who?" So her appearance was my first Midnight Mass. But your live performance before the film blew me away; it's fabulous!

Grannell: Thank you.

Guillén: If there's one thing I can honestly say to people who have never been to Midnight Mass, it's that you totally get your money's worth. It's so worth the price of admission. Not only do you get to see a classic cult film but you get all this on-stage theater. You perform consummately!

Grannell: We try. [Laughs.] We have fallen on our faces. Sometimes that's some of the best shows, when we fall on our faces. We just roll with the punches. That's the first rule of improv: you just keep going. In 10 years we've done some great stuff and we've made some mistakes but, y'know, no regrets.

Part Two of this interview can be found here.

Thursday, 12 July 2007

2007 SFSFF—Michael Hawley's Preview


It's easy to become overwhelmed by the wealth of film festivals that take place in the Bay Area each year. That's my flimsy excuse, at any rate, for having largely ignored the San Francisco Silent Film Festival ("SFSFF") for the first decade of its existence. Then last year I got smart and checked out four of their offerings. Two of them, Tod Browning's creep-fest The Unholy Three (1925) with Lon Chaney, and Julien Duvivier's department store drama Au Bonheur des Dames (1930), turned out to be among my most memorable film events of 2006, and now I'm hooked. The festival's 12th edition will take place from July 13 to 15 at the Castro Theater, and I’m planning to see a whopping eight out of eleven programs. I can think of worse ways of spending a weekend than sitting in America's premiere 1922 movie palace watching gorgeously restored 35mm prints of silent classics with live musical accompaniment.


The festival kicks off on Friday night with Ernst Lubitsch's The Student Prince of Old Heidelberg (1927), starring Ramon Navarro and Norma Shearer. The film will be introduced by San Francisco Chronicle film critic Mick LaSalle, who has written extensively on Shearer. Unfortunately, I'm going to miss Opening Night due to a prior engagement, which is another way of saying I have to work that evening.

I'll also be missing the first program on Saturday morning, Hal Roach: King of Comedy. The program will consist of four fun-sounding, lesser-known shorts from Roach's studio, and will be introduced by Rob Stone of the UCLA Film & Television Archive and Leonard Maltin. The only reason I'm missing this program is because I expect to be up half the previous night attending the 10th Anniversary opening of Peaches Christ's Midnight Mass series at the Bridge Theater, with Mink Stole and Tura Satana live in person. Believe me, it was a tough choice!


I should recover in time for the festival's early afternoon screening of The Valley of the Giants (1927), an adventure film set amongst the sequoias of Kings Canyon National Park. That will be followed by Maciste (1915), which was the first in a series of 26 Italian silent films that starred Bartolomeo Pagano as the titular superhuman strongman Maciste (a character he originally portrayed in the 1914 blockbuster Cabiria.) Early evening will bring one of the programs I'm most anticipating: Camille (1921) starring Rudolph Valentino/Alla Nazimova, which the festival promises, "just might be the most defiantly flamboyant art film to even come out of Hollywood." This program is a special tribute to Turner Classic Movies ("TCM"), and revered TCM on-screen host Robert Osborne will be there to introduce the screening. Finally, William A. Wellman's Beggars of Life (1928) will cap off the day. Louise Brooks, Wallace Beery and Richard Arlen star in this social drama of hobos and train hoppers, and the director's son, William Wellman Jr. is scheduled to make a guest appearance at the Castro that evening.

I'll be missing the morning program on Sunday, too, and once again Peaches Christ is to blame (director John Waters will be making his first-ever appearance at Midnight Mass the previous evening.) The program, More Amazing Tales From the Archives, does sound fascinating. First, Rob Stone will examine the need to preserve non-feature silent films such as trailers, newsreels and shorts. Then Patrick Loughney of the George Eastman House will take a look at the extinct format of 28mm films. Luckily, some of these 28mm films have been restored to 35mm and a different one will be screened before nearly every program in this year's festival. It's also nice to note that admission to this program is free.

Anyone who experienced French film archivist/archeologist/preservationist Serge Bromberg's "Treasures From A Chest" program at the 2001 San Francisco International Film Festival knows they're in for a treat with Retour de Flamme (Saved From the Flames). This new program of rarities from M. Bromberg's Lobster Films—which includes obscure works by film pioneer Georges Méliès—sounds like an excellent way for me to begin a second day of silent cinema. Bromberg is a charming raconteur and also provides sublime piano accompaniment to the films he shows.


I was originally planning to skip the next program in order to go out and have a decent meal somewhere in the Castro. That was until I learned that Brian Darr, Bay Area film blogger extraordinaire, had chosen it as his film to profile in the festival catalogue. I trust Brian's taste and am now very much looking forward to seeing William Demille's Miss Lulu Bett (1921). This DeMille is best known as the older brother to famous sibling Cecil B., but he was a director in his own right and this is considered his best film. The following program, Anthony Asquith's British "psycho-noir," A Cottage on Dartmoor (1929), about a man's obsession for a manicurist, will be appropriately introduced by none other than the Film Noir Foundation's Eddie Muller.

Bringing this year's festival to a bombastic finish will be Cecil B. DeMille's The Godless Girl (1929). It's the saga of high school students Judy and Bob—ardent atheist and zealous Christian respectively—who both end up inmates in a sadistic reform school. I saw clips from this recently in the TCM documentary Cecil B. De Mille—American Epic, which screened at the 2007 SFIFF50, and all I can say is … oh brother!

On a final note, anyone looking to update their collection of film-related books will be glad to know that The Booksmith will be setting up shop in the upstairs mezzanine, and will feature book signings by festival guests Robert Osborne, Leonard Maltin, William Wellman Jr., Eddie Muller, Mick LaSalle and others. Also, at SF360, Sean Uyehara has an interesting chat with the new Silent Film Festival Executive Director Stacey Wisnia.

IDAHOMOS UNITE!!—Frameline At the Center Screening of The Fall of '55


We're baaaaaack! Did you miss us? I've been in Oregon attending to family matters. Included on the itinerary, however, was a stopover in Boise, Idaho, where filmmaker Seth Randal (The Fall of '55) graciously introduced me to Alan Virta, historian to the film project. Virta—Head of Special Collections and University Archivist at Boise State University's Albertsons Library—invited me to his home for dinner and his slideshow presentation of his research into Idaho's gay history. This was an honor, an illumination and a delight as his presentation for me was full of fascinating asides he normally doesn't share with his audiences. Dreaming in detail, I hope to eventually bring Virta's informative slideshow to the Bay Area in the near future. With Randal's documentary to pave the way, I believe San Francisco's queer community would appreciate an amplified glimpse into Idaho's gay history. Further, there's a case to be made for an Idaho-San Francisco axis, extending back not only to the events of the Fall of '55 but right into the Castro Flourescence of the 1970s.

After the slideshow, Alan and Seth took me downtown Boise to visit the scene of the crime profiled in The Fall of '55. Pointing out the Ada County Courthouse with its holding cells on the top floor, the police station and the former offices of The Idaho Statesman, Alan and Seth made history visceral; an experience for which I will be forever grateful.

Let this serve as a reminder as well that The Fall of '55—picked up by Frameline Distribution (congratulations, Seth!)—will be screened this evening Thursday, July 12, as part of Frameline's "At the Center" free screenings. San Francisco's LGBT Community Center is located at 1800 Market Street; the free screening of The Fall of '55 is at 7:30PM.

08/01/07 UPDATE: While I was in Boise, Seth--aware that I would have the opportunity--asked if I wouldn't ask John Waters the following question:

Michael Guillén: I'm an Idahomo. At the end of Pink Flamingos, Divine goes to Boise. Where did that reference come from?

John Waters: I know definitely where that came from. There was a big scandal there and a book about it called The Boys of Boise, which was when a lot of married men were busted in a men's room or something and then they all committed suicide. It was a big national story. That's where that's from, that book The Boys of Boise. To this day I think there's one little theater in Boise where my movies play and the distributor always says, "I don't know why they ever book it." And it does okay there and that's why, I think, because there are a few people left in Boise that think Divine's still coming there. That's where they were going to relocate at the end to be the filthiest people in the world.

Sunday, 1 July 2007

TREADING THE BOARDS: TAKE ME OUT—The Evening Class Interview With Jeffrey Cohlman


With Pride Month wrapping up, the TCM Screened Out series complete, and Frameline behind us, The New Conservatory Theatre Center ("NCTC") enters Pride's final inning with all bases loaded. With favorable reviews from Beyond Chron and The San Francisco Sentinel, Director Ed Decker has coached his ensemble into an extended run through July 15 with a special Benefit Performance on Tuesday, July 10th, 8:00 pm to benefit Theatre Bay Area's Lemonade Fund, NCTC's YouthAware Tolerance Education and NCTC's Youth Conservatory Scholarship Programs.

While Glenn Burke was out to teammates and team owners in the 1970's and Billy Bean came out in 1999 after retiring from eight seasons of playing in Major League Baseball, at the time of the writing of this play no major-league baseball player had ever come out to the public during his career. Winner of the 2003 Tony Award for Best Play, Take Me Out by Richard Greenberg is the dramatic exploration of what such an event might be like.

Darren Lemming, the star center fielder of the world champion New York Empires is young, rich, famous, talented, handsome, and so convinced of his popularity that when he casually announces that he is gay, he assumes that the news will be readily accepted by everybody. It isn't. Thus the drama begins.

The world premiere of Take Me Out was presented in a co-production by The Donmar Warehouse, London and The Public/New York Shakespeare Festival. The New York City premiere was at the off-Broadway Anspacher Theatre in the Joseph Papp Public Theater. It later transferred to the Walter Kerr Theatre on Broadway where it ran 355 performances and garnered the Tony Awards for Best Play, Best Performance By A Featured Actor In A Play, and Best Direction. It also won two Drama Desk Awards (out of eight nominations), four Lucille Lortel Awards, an Obie Award, and a GLAAD Media Award.

The NCTC production is solid, sexy and thought-provoking. My favorite performance was by Jeffrey Cohlman as Shane Mungitt. I appreciated his taking the time to talk to me about his participation in the production, inaugurating what will be a featured sidebar here on The Evening ClassTreading the Boards—a look at the Bay Area's theatre scene.

After experiencing Jeffrey Cohlman as racist redneck Shane Mungitt, it's almost startling to discover that Jeffrey is one of the sweetest guys in the world. He almost comes off shy and you want to hug him to bolster his confidence. Formerly a bartender at NCTC, last year he tried out and secured the quirky lead role in The Fabulous Adventures of Captain Queer. While overseas in Europe, Ed Decker offered him the role of Shane Mungitt in Take Me Out and Jeffrey returned to San Francisco specifically to accept the role.

* * *

Michael Guillén: If Patrick Michael Dukeman's role as Mason Marzac is the heart of Take Me Out; your role as Shane Mungitt is the conscience. By contrast to the other performances, I felt yours was the most difficult assignment. Briefly synopsize your character and how you and Ed went about developing him.

Jeffrey Cohlman: Shane Mungitt is from the South. He's your typical foster child, never had a home, never really learned the rights from the wrongs. He's probably a good person to the right people but … he's not in his element. Not only has he been brought to New York City—the whirlpool of all races, which is probably disconcerting to him—but he is also a lover of baseball. He'll go wherever it takes him; wherever he needs to go.

I just told Ed in the very beginning, "I'll bring a lot of stuff to the table; but, I'm very much the kind of actor [who likes to be directed]. Do what you will with me. If you don't like how I walk or how I sit, let me know; I'll change it for you. Whatever you like."

Like Shane, I grew up very wayward. I've been all over the place. Even now I don't really have a place to stay. I go and I do my job and I set up a space with a friend. I'm very wayward. As a result of feeling unlucky in my life, it causes a lot of negative feelings that—fortunately, with this part—I've been able to expel in a proper format.

Guillén: Enacting villainry can be quite complex. Shane isn't really a bad guy, is he? He's just caught in bad circumstances that he doesn't quite know how to handle and, consequently, he makes some bad decisions. How did you and Ed work out the extent to which Shane would be a bad guy?


Cohlman: We honestly didn't work on that. Ed quotes a play I used to stage manage here that said every story is a love story. Regardless of how tormented, insane or incapable or dumb or threatening somebody is, there's some sort of love. I've heard other people refer to other [portrayals of] Shane Mungitt as "unloveable." Just mean and villainous and nothing to love about him; but, there are so many aspects to somebody like this that you can love. Shane—or at least the way I'm portraying Shane—he's probably a pretty cool dude where he comes from. He'd probably show up with his truck and help you move. He seems to have stopped growing. When we first started [rehearsing], Ed said, "There's something really cool that's going on with your character; I pity him, I feel sorry for him. I don't hate him. I hate what he's saying and I hate that he doesn't know better and I pity him and in a small way I kind of love him." So it seemed to be accidental.

Guillén: Perhaps. But give yourself due. You have textured your portrayal with complexity and credibility. That's a difficult assignment, as I said, and you pegged it.

Cohlman: Thank you. This is the first time I've been a mean guy, an angry guy, and it's never felt so right. Though I certainly don't have that much hate and pent-up anger and aggression. I know you're interviewing me but I'm curious from your take why you think Shane is the conscience?

Guillén: Because a person of his circumstances can be so easily misunderstood and readily villainized. Within the audience I was glad to see your character wasn't a silhouette cut from dark broadcloth, that you revealed the bruise he was carrying. Shane's ignorance wasn't really his fault; his ignorance was circumstantial and an audience is required to examine their conscience about judging him. Tell me about your filmmaking.

Cohlman: I haven't really done anything that's huge but I'm part of a special group that puts on the 48-Hour Film Project every year. It's an independent short film festival where you get a 7-8 minute film and on Friday night [you're assigned] a genre, a line of dialog, a character and a prop that has to be in your movie. You create from 7:00PM on Friday to 7:00PM on Sunday. You create, edit, do the sound design, turn it in and they have the festival and show all the films the following Monday. It's really cool. [Here's Cohlman's MySpace page.]

I also make and create my own short films with a few friends of mine, low-key. I've also been involved with the Expression Center for New Media, an art school in Emeryville.

Guillén: Theater and film are truly brethren. I was pleased to discover that—along with your stagework—you were making films.

Cohlman: Oh yeah, I really love it. I love acting in a theater; but what really compels me and excites me is the twirrrr of the camera, watching people set up, all the lighting, understanding how complex and difficult it is to set up movie lighting and then to have the intimacy of someone capturing your picture and your [voice]. You don't have to [projecting] blah blah blah like in the theater. And then cutting it and editing it. I have groups of friends where we got together and made the music for movies, which is even cooler. That whole process really excites me. Not to say that theater doesn't.

Guillén: You were saying the role of Shane Mungitt allowed you to exorcise some demons?

Cohlman: Oh sure.

Guillén: What would you say has been the true value and reward of playing this character?

Cohlman: Doing this character, there have been so many rewards. I got to work with Ed Decker, who was just a great person, great director. I get to be in the Big Theater. It's so cool, y'know? Being on the stage, the opportunity to branch out, to not be the funny guy—even though there are parts of Shane's character that are very funny—he's not trying to be. Just all these parts that have come along. Two years ago I was so brokenhearted. Really down on myself and the world. Then I landed the role of Captain Queer and he was a gay high school student who moonlights as a Gay Super Action Hero. He was an amazing, fabulous guy and that was at a time in my life when I was really down so that role forced me to enjoy myself and to be funny and be fun.

This role has been a blessing because it's perfect timing. I'm just feeling a certain way that is connecting so well with this character and how he feels and it's been this through line of some great thing that you can express yourself. This is my [therapy].

Guillén: Here's a slightly sensitive question. Clearly, you work with children? And yet your acting range allows you to act naked on stage. Are there any conflicts with that in terms of working with the kids? Do they even know you're working nude on stage? Does it matter?

Cohlman: It would matter if I said anything about it. But these are separate [activities]. I've worked with young people for 15 years. Summer camp. Theater programs. If there is something that's appropriate, I'll tell them I'm in a show. They know I'm an actor. This is a role where I wouldn't even invite my brother. He's always very kind. I've been doing theater for a long time and he said, "Hey, do I have to come to this show?" I said, "Naw."

Guillén: Is it difficult for you to be nude on stage?

Cohlman: It's not, surprisingly. I'm a very comfortable kid and I liked to be naked, until I started getting insecure at about age 12 like I think everybody does.

Guillén: Well, you're naked in a group so that helps out somewhat.

Cohlman: But I do have the uncomfortable scene in the shower. But it's such a cool group of people, nobody cares. It was always the challenge. Who's going to get naked first? We all kind of did it on one night. No one was supposed to but a couple of us thought, "Let's do it." But we're all like 12-year-old kids backstage, which is nice. I've reverted. I haven't been like this in a long time. I remember my 11th birthday running around naked in front of all my friends just for kicks and it was no big deal.

Guillén: So where from here?

Cohlman: I had no intention of coming back to San Francisco. I took a three-month trip away with a friend of mine to Paris. But I started getting emails about this show, and about my availability, and could I come back and audition. I came home for Christmas break and I told them I didn't have time to come in, I didn't have a monologue prepared, but they wrote me and said they really wanted me to be a part of the production.

Guillén: I'm glad that they persevered, Jeffrey, because you've done a great job. You lend an important edge to this production. Thank you for taking the time to speak with me today.

Cohlman: No problem. But I don't know where I'm going to go after this honestly. If I had some scratch money, I'd love to make a little film, a real one, y'know? That'd be cool.

Guillén: I wish you luck with that.